What we believe
A short version of why CyberDebunk exists, and the principles we measure ourselves against.
Security is a language problem
Most teams don't ship insecure code because they don't care. They ship it because the tools meant to protect them speak a language no-one in the room reads. We translate.
Plain English beats more dashboards
A scanner that explains what's broken, why a real attacker would care, and exactly what to change is more useful than a wall of red numbers. Every alert ships with a fix, or it doesn't ship.
Compliance should be a side-effect
The GDPR Companion exists because European teams shouldn't have to choose between shipping fast and answering an auditor. Article 32 in plain language, mapped to your actual codebase.
European by default, not by toggle
Customer data lives in Frankfurt and Amsterdam. Our DPO is on staff, not on retainer. SOC 2 Type II is underway; the privacy policy describes current status and how to request details.
Boring is a feature
No surprise pricing. No phantom seats. No legal threats over screenshots. Predictable software run by predictable humans, built to still work the same way next year.